| |
Home
Course:
|
CCS 335
Computers and Information Processing
|
Version:
|
CCS335U3
|
Location:
|
St. Petersburg campus with learning teams to meet as
agreed.
|
Schedule:
|
Monday evenings from 6 p.m. until 10 p.m.
|
Calendar:
|
September 16 through October 14.
|
Course Description:
|
This course introduces the fundamentals of computer
systems and the role of information processing in today’s business
environment. An overview is
presented of information systems, systems development, operating systems
and programming, database management, networking and telecommunications,
and the Internet.
This course is based upon the University of Phoenix
module (version CCS335U3) and adapted by the instructor to meet
students’ needs. Changes from the module will be posted on the
instructor’s website for this course. If there is a discrepancy between
the module and the Instructor’s website for this course, the website
will govern.
|
Instructor:
|
Email: kmadsen@mail.com
Website: www.madsen.us
|
Availability:
|
E-mail is the preferred method of communication. By
telephone, please call Monday through Friday between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m. Or, weekday evenings between 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m.
|
Biography
|
Kurt Madsen has worked as a software engineer,
manager, and consultant in all phases of the system development lifecycle
in the following industries: telecommunications, financial services,
e-commerce, aviation, and healthcare. He has an M.S. in computer science
from New York Polytechnic and a B.A. in economics from Rutgers University.
As an Adjunct Instructor, he has taught computer science at the University
of South Florida, College of Engineering.
2001 - Present. Mr. Madsen founded
MetaTech, Inc., a consulting firm that helps companies become more agile
with respect to how their IT departments handle continually changing
requirements. This is accomplished through recommended changes in
architecture, process, and organization.
1998 - 2001. As a Management Consultant
at Perot Systems, he advised clients on e-commerce projects such as
internet banking and e-marketplaces.
1993 - 1998. At Salomon Brothers, a
wholesale investment bank, he led the development of a
Business-To-Business (B2B) integration product used by banks for
electronic trade confirmation and securities clearance.
1986 - 1993. He began his career at
Nynex Science and Technology, an R&D laboratory, where he specialized
in object-oriented technologies and distributed computing.
|
Student Materials
Books:
|
O'Brien,
James A. (2003). Introduction
to Information Systems: Essentials for the e-Business Enterprise (11th ed.)
[University of Phoenix Edition].
Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
|
Software:
|
You are required to have the software specified
below:
·
Microsoft Office Professional for Windows. The
relevant programs within MS Office Professional for this course include
Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Access (database). The MS Office suite is
used for the course because it is ubiquitous in business. If expenses are
an issue, you may substitute alternate software such as Star Office (which
is free) with prior written permission of the instructor. It is assumed
that students have a basic working knowledge of this software. While some
guidance on usage will be available from the instructor and fellow
students, in-depth instruction in using these software applications is
beyond the scope of this course.
·
An e-mail address.
·
Access to the Internet with a browser (e.g., Internet
Explorer, Netscape Navigator, Konqueror)
·
Virus protection software (e.g., Norton Antivirus from
www.symantec.com)
|
e-Resources:
|
University library selected readings page for this
course:
URL:
http://www.apollolibrary.com/srp/login.asp
User Name:
uphoenix
Password:
sp2no5
|
University of Phoenix
Materials
|
University of Phoenix approved style guide
“Library Handbook.”
(Download from http://ecampus.phoenix.edu.)
“Directions
for Completing Learning Team Log.”
(This is available for download from http://ecampus.phoenix.edu.)
“Learning Team Log.”
(Download from http://ecampus.phoenix.edu.)
“Directions for Completing the Learning
Summary.” (This is available for download from http://ecampus.phoenix.edu.)
“Learning Summary.” (Download from http://ecampus.phoenix.edu.)
|
Learning Resources
|
Students are highly encouraged to participate in
using the learning resource center for research and study. The digital
library is open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and is completely free of
charge. Registration to use the digital library is required – Web Site: www.library.uophx.edu
|
|
|
|
Policies and Grading
Course Standards
|
UOP trusts each student to maintain high standards of
honesty and ethical behavior. All
assignments submitted in fulfillment of course requirements must be the
students’ own work. All
assignments except those designed as “group” is meant to be individual
efforts. Group work is meant
to be equal efforts by all group members. It is assumed that students will
perform professionally in preparing work required for this class.
|
Plagiarism
|
“Plagiarism (from a Latin word for “kidnapper”)
is the presentation of someone else’s ideas or words as your own.
Whether deliberate or accidental, plagiarism is a serious and often
punishable offense” (Aaron, 1998, p. 258). Please review The Little,
Brown Compact Handbook, 4th ed., pp. 329-333.
|
Grading of Written Work
|
All documents are to be typed, spell-checked and
grammar checked, submitted double-spaced, and prepared in the proper APA
format required for the program. The
instructor will use The Little, Brown Compact Handbook (3rd ed.) for
format reference. The
attached “Standards for Written Work” can be used as guide to evaluate
and weight the scoring of papers.
· Assignments,
both oral and written, will be evaluated on:
· Completion
of assigned task (instructions)
· Submission
of assigned task on time
· Evidence
of sufficient time spent appropriately
· Quality
of content and research
|
Grading of Oral Presentation
|
Although the facilitator is evaluating your
presentation, he/she is not your sole audience.
Be sure to engage your entire audience, in this case, your fellow
classmates: Appropriate eye contact toward the audience; ask them
questions or ask for their opinions.
Structure your presentation so that you address the following
elements:
1.
Motivate: Why is this
important?
2.
Preview: What specific
points/topics are being covered?
3.
Discuss: Cover each
point/topic with adequate support.
4.
Review: What was
covered and how it applies.
The attached “Standards for Oral Presentations”
can be used to evaluate and weight the scoring of your presentations.
|
Late Policy
|
All assignments are to be completed prior to
the week in which they appear in the module or website. Assignments must
be turned in the night that they are due. No emailed revisions will be
accepted past the due date (without assessing a late penalty).
A 10% late penalty will be assessed for all late or
incomplete work. All missed assignments must be made up by the next
session. Assignments not submitted during next session immediately
following the due date will receive a zero. No assignments will be
accepted past the last night of the course.
An “I” grade may be issued if requested and
approved by the instructor, before course completion.
The “I” must be made up within three weeks and the highest
grade possible for those assignments is a “B”.
|
Attendance and Participation
|
Since this course is only five weeks, students are
strongly encouraged to attend all workshop and learning team sessions. Per
university policy, students are allowed one workshop absence and one
absence for learning team meetings during the course. AN INSTRUCTOR CANNOT
ISSUE A GRADE OTHER THAN “W” OR “WF” TO A STUDENT WITH MORE THAN
ONE WORKSHOP ABSENCE OR LEARNING TEAM MEETING. There is no approval for
second absences.
Any absence will adversely affect the final course
grade (e.g., attendance points, participation points, quizzes, and the
late penalty as applicable). If there are assignments that are due on the
night of the absence, and those assignments are not emailed to the
instructor by the 6:00 p.m. that night, they will be considered late and
the late penalty will apply. [The reason for this policy is that
assignments may carry more weight towards the final grade than attendance
and participation points. If it were possible to turn in assignments after
6:00 p.m., there would an incentive to miss a workshop if a student were
running late with completing an assignment.]
|
Evalution Criteria
|
The final grade will be determined by a weighted
average of the following evaluation criteria:
Assignments
and Criteria
|
Assigned
|
Due
|
Weight
|
Individual
(70%)
|
|
|
|
Participation
and Attendance
2 pts per workshop; 1 pt per LT meeting
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
14%
|
Individual
Assignment 1
|
Workshop
2
|
Workshop
3
|
15%
|
Individual
Assignment 2
|
Workshop
3
|
Workshop
4
|
15%
|
Individual
Assignment 3
|
Workshop
4
|
Workshop
5
|
15%
|
Quiz
1 (Practice)
|
n/a
|
Workshop
2
|
0%
|
Quiz
2
|
n/a
|
Workshop
3
|
5%
|
Quiz
3
|
n/a
|
Workshop
4
|
6%
|
|
|
|
|
Learning
Team (30%)
|
|
|
|
Executive
Summary and 5 lists (for business problem statement)
|
Workshop
1
|
Workshop
2
|
2%
|
Business
Requirements for Project
|
Workshop
2
|
Workshop
3
|
4%
|
Project
Solution Design
|
Workshop
3
|
Workshop
4
|
4%
|
Learning
Team Project Paper
|
Workshop
4
|
Workshop
5
|
10%
|
Learning
Team Project Presentation
|
n/a
|
Workshop
5
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
Grading Standards
|
Final letter grades and G.P.A. input will be
determined using upon the following ranges:
Grade
|
Letter Grade
|
Quality Points
|
95-100
|
A
|
4.00
|
90-94
|
A-
|
3.66
|
87-89
|
B+
|
3.33
|
84-86
|
B
|
3.00
|
80-83
|
B-
|
2.66
|
77-79
|
C+
|
2.33
|
74-76
|
C
|
2.00
|
70-73
|
C-
|
1.66
|
67-69
|
D+
|
1.33
|
64-66
|
D
|
1.00
|
60-63
|
D-
|
0.66
|
59
|
F
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
Teaching / Learning Model
|
This course will incorporate faculty facilitation of
theoretical content knowledge and its applications. Student achievement of course objectives is evidenced by
text-based discussions, individual written work, quizzes, oral
assignments, and team work. Through
the accomplishment of projects, students practice and refine learned
skills and evidence application of knowledge through product submissions
for evaluation and grading.
|
Learning Teams
|
Students are encouraged to review the course module
for instructions on the governance of Learning Teams, student
responsibilities for the group, and themselves. Students will complete a
“Learning Team Charter” for this course.
The “Learning Team Log” is an official attendance log to
document activities and/or performance related issues.
Any Learning Team member who does not contribute risks loosing
credit for the learning team evaluation criteria. The log should
reflect the lack of contribution or performance and be agreed upon by the
group
Learning teams are an extension of the classes and
an essential part of the academic experience for students.
In addition to providing a supplemental learning environment for
mastery of course content, learning teams also provide students with an
opportunity to develop and refine teamwork skills. Students are expected
to ascertain the location for their learning team meeting each week during
the class session. The
instructor must approve the location as appropriate and conducive to
learning. At the first
meeting of the learning team, each team should create a charter that will
be reviewed by the instructor during the second class session. Each week,
each learning team must complete a learning team log documenting each
member’s attendance at the learning team meetings.
Non-attendance or attendance for less than the required scheduled
time of Learning Team meetings by any individual student will be
considered during the grading process for that student.
Non-attendance at Learning Team meetings and/or classroom meetings
may result in course withdrawal and a "W" grade being issued.
Teams should create one unified log for the entire team’s
activity each week that is signed by each team member.
Two copies of that log should be provided to the faculty member, so
that one copy can be turned in for attendance and the other copy retained
by the faculty member.
|
|